Elections to the Parliament of the European Union take place every five years by universal adult suffrage. 736 MEPs[1] are elected to the European Parliament which has been directly elected since 1979. No other body is directly elected although the Council of the European Union and European Council is largely composed of nationally elected officials.[2] Europarties have the exclusive right to campaign EU-wide for the European elections.
Contents |
There is no uniform voting system for the election of MEPs; rather, each member state is free to choose its own system, subject to three restrictions:[3]
The allocation of seats to each member state is based on the principle of degressive proportionality, so that, while the size of the population of each country is taken into account, smaller states elect more MEPs than is justified by their populations. As the number of MEPs granted to each country has arisen from treaty negotiations, there is no precise formula for the apportionment of seats among member states. No change in this configuration can occur without the unanimous consent of all governments.[3][4]
European Parliament Apportionment changes between the Treaty of Nice and the Treaty of Lisbon (as calculated for purposes of the '09 European Elections) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member state | 2007 Nice |
2009 Nice |
2014 Lisbon |
Member state | 2007 Nice |
2009 Nice |
2014 Lisbon |
Member state | 2007 Nice |
2009 Nice |
2014 Lisbon |
||
Germany | 99 | 99 | 96 | Czech Republic | 24 | 22 | 22 | Slovakia | 14 | 13 | 13 | ||
France | 78 | 72 | 74 | Greece | 24 | 22 | 22 | Ireland | 13 | 12 | 12 | ||
United Kingdoma | 78 | 72 | 73 | Hungary | 24 | 22 | 22 | Lithuania | 13 | 12 | 12 | ||
Italy | 78 | 72 | 73 | Portugal | 24 | 22 | 22 | Latvia | 9 | 8 | 9 | ||
Spain | 54 | 50 | 54 | Sweden | 19 | 18 | 20 | Slovenia | 7 | 7 | 8 | ||
Poland | 54 | 50 | 51 | Austria | 18 | 17 | 19 | Cyprus | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
Romania | 35 | 33 | 33 | Bulgaria | 18 | 17 | 18 | Estonia | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
Netherlands | 27 | 25 | 26 | Finland | 14 | 13 | 13 | Luxembourg | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
Belgium | 24 | 22 | 22 | Denmark | 14 | 13 | 13 | Malta | 5 | 5 | 6 | ||
a Includes Gibraltar, but not any other BOT, SBA or Crown dependency b The speaker is not counted officially, thus leaving 750 MEPs. Italicised countries are divided into sub-national constiuencies |
Total: | 785 | 736 | 751b |
The European Union has a multi-party system comprised by a number of ideologically diverse Europarties. As no one Europarty has ever gained power alone, their affiliated parliamentary groups must work with each other to pass legislation. Since no pan-European government is formed as a result of the European elections, long-term programmatic coalitions have yet to take place.
Europarties have the exclusive right to campaign for the European elections; their parliamentary groups are strictly forbidden to campaign and to spend funds for any campaign-related activity. With the Lisbon Treaty now in-force, Europarties are obliged from now-on to put forward a candidate for President of the European Commission; each Presidential candidate will, in fact, lead the pan-European campaign of the Europarty.
The two major parties are the centre-right European People's Party and Party of European Socialists. They form the two largest groups, (called EPP and S&D respectively) along with other smaller parties. There are numerous other groups including communists, greens, regionalists, conservatives, Liberals and eurosceptics. Together they form the seven recognised groups in the parliament.[5] MEPs that are not members of groups are known as non-inscrits.
Analysis contend that European elections are fought on national issues and used by voters to punish their governments mid-term. Turnout has also been falling steadily since the first elections in 1979 indicating increased apathy about the Parliament despite its increase in power over that period. The turnout is an increasingly big issue. Despite falling below 50% since 1999, turnout is not yet as low as that of the US Midterm elections which usually fall below 40%. The turnout has fallen in every EU election since the first. In 2009, the overall turnout was just 43%, down from 45.5% in 2004. In Britain the turnout was just 34.3%, down from 38% in 2004.
However that situation is not criticised so much due to the fact the US President is elected separately, whereas the EU Commission President is appointed. Some such as former Parliament President Pat Cox has also noted that the 1999 election turnout was higher than the previous US Presidential election.[6][7] It is hoped though that by more closely linking that post to the elections, turnout should increase.[8][9][10]
List of previous elections |
List of European Parliament elections by state |
Historical percentage results in union-wide elections of the three major groups by region.[11]
REGION | 1979 | 1984 | 1989 | 1994 | 1999 | 2004 | 2009 |
3.6 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 22 | 35.3 | 31.2 | 10.9 | |
Northern[12] | 3.6 | 2.7 | 4.5 | 6.8 | 16.7 | 18.1 | 20.3 |
23.2 | 33 | 45.5 | 56.8 | 27.6 | 23.9 | 21 | |
33.6 | 30.9 | 26.7 | 31.9 | 36.4 | 34.9 | 37.3 | |
Western[13] | 6.5 | 10.6 | 12 | 8.5 | 5.2 | 11.9 | 12.5 |
34.1 | 32.7 | 32.7 | 29.9 | 27.9 | 30.2 | 20.8 | |
37 | 34.3 | 29.6 | 25.9 | 39.8 | 38.2 | 45.2 | |
Southern[14] | 6.2 | 4.8 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 5 | 7.9 | 5 |
16 | 21 | 29.1 | 29.9 | 30.8 | 33 | 35 | |
- | - | - | - | - | 46.4 | 41 | |
Eastern[15] | - | - | - | - | - | 14.3 | 10 |
- | - | - | - | - | 21.4 | 23.7 | |
26 | 25.3 | 23.4 | 27.7 | 37.2 | 36.9 | 36 | |
Total | 9.8 | 7.1 | 9.5 | 7.6 | 8 | 12.4 | 11.4 |
27.6 | 30 | 34.2 | 34.9 | 28.8 | 28.3 | 25 | |
Turnout | 63 | 61 | 58.5 | 56.8 | 49.4 | 45.5 | 43 |
Legend: [ ] Socialist (PES/S&D) – [ ] Liberal (ELDR/ALDE) – [ ] People's (EPP/EPP-ED)
As of 2011 reforms by liberal MEP Andrew Duff are being considered by Parliament which are seen as the most significant overhaul of the electoral system since elections began. 25 extra MEPs would be added on a transnational European list with its candidates being selected by the European party groups rather than national member parties. The candidate lists would have to represent a third of member states and are seen as a way to personalise and dramatise the elections in order to reengage an apathetic electorate. Duff sees the next Commission President possibly coming from the transnational list. Duff's proposals also include a single electoral roll, regular reapportioning of seats, one set of immunity rules and the holding of elections in May rather than June. However, due to a waning of support and possible opposition from member states, Duff has taken the proposal back to committee in order to get broader support before putting them before the plenary in autumn 2011.[16]
Election | Largest Group | President | Party |
1994 | PES | Jacques Santer | EPP |
1999 | EPP-ED | Romano Prodi | PES |
2004 | EPP | José Manuel Barroso | EPP |
2009 | EPP | José Manuel Barroso | EPP |
The third Delors Commission had a short mandate, in order to bring the terms of the Commission in line with that of the Parliament. Under the European Constitution the European Council would have to take into account the results of the latest European elections and, furthermore, the Parliament would ceremonially "elect", rather than simply approve, the Council's proposed candidate. This was taken as the parliament's cue to have its parties run with candidates for the President of the European Commission with the candidate of the winning party being proposed by the Council.[17]
This was partly put into practice in 2004 when the European Council selected a candidate from the political party which won that year's election. However at that time only one party had run with a specific candidate: the European Green Party, who had the first true pan-European political party with a common campaign,[18] put forward Daniel Cohn-Bendit.[17] However the fractious nature of the other political parties led to no other candidates, the People's Party only mentioned four or five people they'd like to be President.[19] The Constitution failed ratification but these amendments have been carried over to the Treaty of Lisbon which came into force in 2009.
There are plans to strengthen the European political parties[10] in order for them to propose candidates for the 2009 election.[9][20] The European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party have already indicated, in their October 2007 congress, their intention for forward a candidate for the post as part of a common campaign.[21] They failed to do so however the European People's Party did select Barroso as their candidate and, as the largest party, Barroso's turn was renewed. The Socialists, disappointed at the 2009 election, agreed to put forward a candidate for Commission President at all subsequent elections. There is a campaign within that party to have open primaries for said candidate.[22]
In February 2008, President Barroso admitted there was a problem in legitimacy and that, despite having the same legitimacy as Prime Ministers in theory, in practice it was not the case. The low turnout creates a problem for the President's legitimacy, with the lack of a "European political sphere", but analysis claim that if citizens were voting for a list of candidates for the post of President, turn out would be much higher than that seen in recent years.[23]
With the Lisbon Treaty now in-force, Europarties are obliged from now-on to put forward a candidate for President of the European Commission; each Presidential candidate will, in fact, lead the pan-European campaign of the Europarty.
The President of the European Parliament Jerzy Buzek proposed in 2010 that Commissioners be directly elected, by member states placing their candidate at the top of their voting lists in European elections. That would give them individually, and the body as a whole, a democratic mandate.[24]
European Union |
This article is part of the series: |
Policies and issues
|
Elections
|
Area | Dates | Seats | Electorate | Turnout | Previous | Next | Election methods | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
European Community (EC-9) |
7, 10 June 1979 |
410 | 191,783,528 | 63% | Inaugural | 1981 | All PR, except UK (not NI) which used FPTP |
[1][2] [3] |
Area | Dates | Seats | Electorate | Turnout | Previous | Next | Election methods | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
European Community (EC-10) |
14, 17 June 1984 |
434 | 200,505,752 | 61% | 1979 | 1989 | All PR, except UK (not NI) which used FPTP |
[4] [5] [6] |
Area | Dates | Seats | Electorate | Turnout | Previous | Next | Election methods | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
European Community (EC-12) |
15-18 June 1989 |
518 | 244,951,379 | 58.5% | 1984 | 1994 | All PR, except UK (not NI) which used FPTP |
[7] [8][9] [10] |
Area | Dates | Seats | Electorate | Turnout | Previous | Next | Election methods | Sources |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
European Union (EU-12) |
9, 12 June 1994 |
567 | 269,261,000 | 56.8% | 1989 | 1995 | All PR, except UK (not NI) which used FPTP |
[11] [12] |
Area | European Union (EU-15) | Sources |
---|---|---|
Dates | • Thursday 10 June: Netherlands, United Kingdom, Denmark • Friday 11 June: Ireland • Sunday 13 June: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, Sweden |
[13][14] |
Seats | 626 | [15][16] |
Candidates | over 10,000 | [17] |
Electorate | 288 million | [18] |
Turnout | 49.8% | [19] |
Previous | European Parliament election, 1994 | n/a |
Next | European Parliament election, 2004 | n/a |
Election methods | All proportional representation. | [20] |
Preference voting allowed? | • Yes, via open list: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Italy, Luxembourg (with panachage), Netherlands, Sweden. • Yes, via STV: Ireland, United Kingdom (NI only) • No: the rest |
[21][22] |
Cutoff? | • 5%: France, Germany • 4%: Austria, Sweden • 3%: Greece • none: the rest |
[23] |
Seat allocation | • Sainte-Laguë method: Sweden • STV method: Ireland, United Kingdom (NI only) • Hare-Niemeyer method: Germany • Pro-rata: Greece • Largest remainder method: Italy • D'Hondt method: the rest |
[24][25][26] |
Constituency boundaries | • Member state subdivided into multiple constituencies: Belgium (3), Ireland (4), Italy (5), United Kingdom (12) • Mixture: Germany (candidate lists at Länder or national level), Finland (candidate lists at electoral district or national level) • Member state as single constituency: the rest |
[27][28][29] |
Minimum voting age | 18 | [30][31] |
Area | European Union (EU-25) | Sources |
---|---|---|
Dates | • Thursday 10 June: Netherlands, United Kingdom, • Friday 11 June: Czech Republic, Ireland • Saturday 12 June: Czech Republic, Italy, Latvia, Malta • Sunday 13 June: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden |
[32] |
Seats | 732 | [33][34] |
Candidates | over 14,600 | [35] |
Electorate | 342 million | [36][37][38] |
Turnout | 45.6% | [39] |
Previous | European Parliament election, 1999 | n/a |
Next | European Parliament election, 2009 | n/a |
Election methods | All proportional representation. | [40] |
Preference voting allowed? | • Yes, via open list: Austria, Belgium, Lithuania, Luxembourg (with panachage), Netherlands, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sweden. • Yes, via STV: Ireland, Malta, United Kingdom (NI only) • No: the rest |
[41][42][43] |
Cutoff? | • 5%: Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia • 4%: Austria, Sweden • 3%: Greece • none: the rest |
[44][45][46] |
Seat allocation | • Sainte-Laguë method: Latvia, Sweden • STV method: Ireland, Malta, United Kingdom (NI only) • Highest averages method: France • Largest remainder method: Italy • Pro-rata: Greece • Droop method: Slovakia • Hare-Niemeyer method: Germany • Hare-Niemeyer method and D'Hondt method: Poland • D'Hondt method: the rest |
[47][48][49][50][51] |
Constituency boundaries | • Member state subdivided into multiple constituencies: Belgium (3), France (8), Ireland (4), Italy (5), Poland (13), United Kingdom (12) • Mixture: Germany (candidate lists at Länder or national level) • Member state as single constituency: the rest |
[52][53][54] |
Minimum voting age | 18 | [55] |
Presidential election | • First round: Josep Borrell, 388 votes; Bronisław Geremek, 208 votes; Francis Wurtz, 51 votes • Josep Borrell, having achieved a majority of valid votes in the first round, was elected President of the European Parliament |
[56] |
Group | Description | Details | % | MEPs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOC | Social Democrats | West Germany 35, Belgium 7, Denmark 4, France 22, Ireland 4, Italy 13, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 9, UK 18 | 28% | 113 | |
EPP | Christian Democrats | West Germany 42, Belgium 10, France 8, Ireland 4, Italy 30, Luxembourg 3, Netherlands 10 | 26% | 107 | |
ED | Conservatives | Denmark 3, UK 61 | 16% | 64 | |
COM | Communists and the Far Left | Denmark 1, France 19, Italy 24 | 11% | 44 | |
LD | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | West Germany 4, Belgium 4, Denmark 3, France 17, Ireland 1, Italy 5, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 4 | 10% | 40 | |
EPD | National Conservatives | Denmark 1, France 15, Ireland 5, UK 1 | 5% | 22 | |
CDI | Heterogeneous | Belgium 1, Denmark 4, Ireland 1, Italy 5 | 3% | 11 | |
NI | Independents | Belgium 2, Italy 4, Netherlands 2, UK 1 | 2% | 9 | |
Sources: [57] [58] [59] [60] | 100% | 410 |
Group | Description | Details | % | MEPs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOC | Social Democrats | West Germany 33, Belgium 7, Denmark 4, France 20, Italy 12, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 9, UK 33, Greece 10 | 30% | 130 | |
EPP | Christian Democrats | West Germany 41, Belgium 6, Denmark 1, France 9, Ireland 6, Italy 27, Luxembourg 3, Netherlands 8, Greece 9 | 25% | 110 | |
ED | Conservatives | Denmark 4, UK 46 | 12% | 50 | |
COM | Communists and the Far Left | Denmark 1, France 10, Italy 26, Greece 4 | 9% | 41 | |
LD | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | Belgium 5, Denmark 2, France 12, Ireland 1, Italy 5, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 5 | 7% | 31 | |
EDA | National Conservatives | France 20, Ireland 8, UK 1 | 7% | 29 | |
RBW | Greens and Regionalists | West Germany 7, Belgium 4, Denmark 4, Italy 3, Netherlands 2 | 5% | 20 | |
ER | Far-Right Nationalists | France 10, Italy 5, Greece 1 | 4% | 16 | |
NI | Independents | Belgium 2, Italy 3, Netherlands 1, UK 1 | 2% | 7 | |
Sources: [61] [62] | 100% | 434 |
Group | Description | Details | % | MEPs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOC | Social Democrats | West Germany 31, Belgium 8, Denmark 4, France 22, Ireland 1, Italy 14, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 8, UK 46, Greece 9, Spain 27, Portugal 8 | 35% | 180 | |
EPP | Christian Democrats | West Germany 32, Belgium 7, Denmark 2, France 6, Ireland 4, Italy 27, Luxembourg 3, Netherlands 10, UK 1, Greece 10, Spain 16, Portugal 3 | 23% | 121 | |
LDR | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | West Germany 4, Belgium 4, Denmark 3, France 13, Ireland 2, Italy 3, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 4, Spain 6, Portugal 9 | 9% | 49 | |
EUL & LU | Communists and the Far Left | Denmark 1, France 7, Ireland 1, Italy 22, Greece 4, Spain 4, Portugal 3 | 8% | 42 (28+14) | |
ED | Conservatives | Denmark 2, UK 32 | 7% | 34 | |
G | Greens | West Germany 8, Belgium 3, France 8, Italy 7, Netherlands 2, Spain 1, Portugal 1 | 6% | 30 | |
EDA | National Conservatives | France 13, Ireland 6, Greece 1 | 4% | 20 | |
DR | Far-Right Nationalists | West Germany 6, Belgium 1, France 10 | 3% | 17 | |
RBW | Regionalists | Belgium 1, Denmark 4, France 1, Ireland 1, Italy 3, UK 1, Spain 2 | 3% | 13 | |
NI | Independents | France 1, Italy 5, Netherlands 1, UK 1, Spain 4 | 2% | 12 | |
Sources: [63] [64] [65] [66] | 100% | 518 |
Group | Description | Details | % | MEPs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PES | Social Democrats | Germany 40, Belgium 6, Denmark 3, France 15, Ireland 1, Italy 18, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 8, UK 63, Greece 10, Spain 22, Portugal 10 | 35% | 198 | |
EPP | Conservatives and Christian Democrats | Germany 47, Belgium 7, Denmark 3, France 13, Ireland 4, Italy 12, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 10, UK 19, Greece 9, Spain 30, Portugal 1 | 28% | 157 | |
ELDR | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | Belgium 6, Denmark 5, France 1, Ireland 1, Italy 7, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 10, UK 2, Spain 2, Portugal 8 | 8% | 43 | |
EUL | Communists and the Far Left | France 7, Italy 5, Greece 4, Spain 9, Portugal 3 | 5% | 28 | |
NI | Independents | Belgium 3, France 11, Italy 12, UK 1 | 5% | 27 | |
FE | Conservatives and Christian Democrats | Italy 27 | 5% | 27 | |
EDA | National Conservatives | France 14, Ireland 7, Greece 2, Portugal 3 | 5% | 26 | |
G | Greens | Germany 12, Belgium 2, Denmark 1, Ireland 2, Italy 4, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 1 | 4% | 23 | |
ERA | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | Belgium 1, France 13, Italy 2, UK 2, Spain 1 | 3% | 19 | |
EN | Eurosceptics | Denmark 4, France 13, Netherlands 2 | 3% | 19 | |
Sources: [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] | 100% | 567 |
Group | Description | Details | % | MEPs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP-ED | Conservatives and Christian Democrats | Germany 53, Belgium 5, Denmark 1, France 21, Ireland 5, Italy 34, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 9, UK 37, Greece 9, Spain 29, Portugal 9, Austria 7, Finland 5, Sweden 5 | 37% | 233 | |
PES | Social Democrats | Germany 33, Belgium 5, Denmark 3, France 22, Ireland 1, Italy 17, Luxembourg 2, Netherlands 6, UK 30, Greece 9, Spain 24, Portugal 12, Austria 7, Finland 3, Sweden 6 | 29% | 180 | |
ELDR | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | Belgium 5, Denmark 6, Ireland 1, Italy 7, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 8, UK 10, Spain 3, Finland 5, Sweden 4 | 8% | 50 | |
G/EFA | Greens and Regionalists | Germany 7, Belgium 7, France 9, Ireland 2, Italy 2, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 4, UK 6, Spain 4, Austria 2, Finland 2, Sweden 2 | 8% | 48 | |
EUL/NGL | Communists and the Far Left | Germany 6, Denmark 1, France 11, Italy 6, Netherlands 1, Greece 7, Spain 4, Portugal 2, Finland 1, Sweden 3 | 7% | 42 | |
UEN | National Conservatives | Denmark 1, France 13, Ireland 6, Italy 9, Portugal 2 | 5% | 31 | |
NI & TGI | Independents | Belgium 2, France 5, Italy 12, UK 1, Spain 1, Austria 5 | 4% | 26 (18+8) | |
EDD | Eurosceptics | Denmark 4, France 6, Netherlands 3, UK 3 | 3% | 16 | |
Sources: [72] | 100% | 626 |
Group | Description | Details | % | MEPs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP-ED | Conservatives and Christian Democrats | Germany 49, Belgium 6, Denmark 1, France 17, Ireland 5, Italy 24, Luxembourg 3, Netherlands 7, UK 28, Greece 11, Spain 24, Portugal 9, Austria 6, Finland 4, Sweden 5, Cyprus 3, Estonia 1, Hungary 13, Latvia 3, Lithuania 2, Malta 2, Poland 19, Czech Republic 14, Slovakia 8, Slovenia 4 | 37% | 268 | |
PES | Social Democrats | Germany 23, Belgium 7, Denmark 5, France 31, Ireland 1, Italy 16, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 7, UK 19, Greece 8, Spain 24, Portugal 12, Austria 7, Finland 3, Sweden 5, Estonia 3, Hungary 9, Lithuania 2, Malta 3, Poland 8, Czech Republic 2, Slovakia 3, Slovenia 1 | 27% | 200 | |
ALDE | Liberals and Liberal Democrats | Germany 7, Belgium 6, Denmark 4, France 11, Ireland 1, Italy 12, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 5, UK 12, Spain 2, Finland 5, Sweden 3, Cyprus 1, Estonia 2, Hungary 2, Latvia 1, Lithuania 7, Poland 4, Slovenia 2 | 12% | 88 | |
G/EFA | Greens and Regionalists | Germany 13, Belgium 2, Denmark 1, France 6, Italy 2, Luxembourg 1, Netherlands 4, UK 5, Spain 3, Austria 2, Finland 1, Sweden 1, Latvia 1 | 6% | 42 | |
EUL/NGL | Communists and the Far Left | Germany 7, Denmark 1, France 3, Ireland 1, Italy 7, Netherlands 2, UK 1, Greece 4, Spain 1, Portugal 3, Finland 1, Sweden 2, Cyprus 2, Czech Republic 6 | 6% | 41 | |
IND/DEM | Eurosceptics | Denmark 1, France 3, Ireland 1, Italy 4, Netherlands 2, UK 11, Greece 1, Sweden 3, Poland 10, Czech Republic 1 | 5% | 37 | |
NI | Independents | Belgium 3, France 7, Italy 4, UK 2, Austria 3, Poland 6, Czech Republic 1, Slovakia 3 | 4% | 29 | |
UEN | National Conservatives | Denmark 1, Ireland 4, Italy 9, Latvia 4, Lithuania 2, Poland 7 | 4% | 27 | |
Sources: [73] [74] [75] [76] | 100% | 732 |
|
|
|